Assumptions: Rewards

Posted: 18 July 2012 in Game Structure
Tags: , , , ,

I’ve been mulling over this post for a little bit now, but John Arcadian at Gnome Stew just made a post about running a no-character-advancement game which has spurred me to actually put pen to paper and say what I think.

The Gnome Stew post talks about the idea of playing a campaign where characters do not advance in level, or alternatively only advance during downtime between story arcs.  It lists a number of benefits to this approach, not the least of which, in my opinion, is eliminating the sense of “my character will be awesome at Level 5.”  Your character is awesome now.  John makes a few other good points and it’s worth a quick read; this post is more about the assumptions and expectations of rewards in D&D.

One of the trends that bothers me about D&D rewards is that it seems like the expected reward, from both players and DMs, is experience points.  When characters complete some goal — rescue the princess, kill the goblins, solve the puzzle — they might get some treasure, they may get some in-game renown, they could open up previously-inaccessible areas.  But across the board it’s expected that they’ll get Experience points.  The concern and the danger is that the difference in power from one level to the next is a bit more than most people expect, and the assumption of Experience-as-default-reward will tend to move you quickly up that scale.  If “regular people” are 1st or 2nd Level and “historical legends” are 4th and 5th Level, an assumption that has characters advancing to Herculean-tier power in a handful of adventures is problematic.

Because of this, I think that reigning in experience rewards in favor of gold, magic items, renown, and influence over the game world can lead to a richer (heh) gaming experience.  I almost always run my games with Pathfinder’s “slow progression” XP scale, which is about 150% of the standard scale, but even before reading the Gnome Stew post I’d considered removing XP rewards entirely and tying Level Advancement directly to story-arc milestones and accomplishments.  If going up in level means developing skills beyond a character’s professional peers, or at the mid- and high-end of the scale becoming more than human or even godlike, it makes sense to tether that to a pivotal moment when the character accomplishes some feat or destroys the Big Bad.  Hitting 4th Level because you killed your 47th Goblin just feels wrong.

Of course, I’m not sure I care for a game with no character advancement, but that’s something that should be seasoned to taste.  As John says, if you start in the sweet spot, when your character is awesome and the situations you face and interesting and challenging, who needs character advancement?

  1. Brendan says:

    E6 (or whatever number is your favorite) is the best solution to this problem.

    If you are interested in a “no mechanical advancement” game, you might want to check out classic Traveller. I think that is the best known example, and it looks like a really good game (though I have never played it). There are several “fantasy” versions of the game too that have been created by people online.

    Psychologically though, I think XP and level serve a very important purpose. They tap into that animal reward center part of your brain. I bet if you connected D&D players to an MRI, they would get major dopamine surges when getting XP and levelling up.

    • Jack says:

      Yeah, I’m a big fan of E6 (specifically, and the concept generally) — it lets you carve out the tier you want to live in in a nice, system-friendly way. I also just started hearing about Traveler and I’ve been meaning to give it a look.

      I think you’re right that D&D players *do* get a rush from XP and leveling — except for those who find the leveling process daunting or annoying. But I’m not sure that this isn’t a learned response, and it seems to me that you could replace XP rewards with treasure or influence and get a similar response, or just tie XP and leveling to certain campaign milestones.

  2. […] just read this fine post (via Jack’sToolBox) which kind of covers similar […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s